Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Sadly the porn industry shot themselves in the foot almost a decade ago trying to scam as much money out of people as possible until VISA and MasterCard stepped in themselves and banned a terrible practice from being accepted.

Remember in 2012 the whole hubbub of "pre-checked cross-sales?"

The act of hiding the checkbox below the fold of the screen and make the visitor think there's nothing more below so they won't uncheck the box that says "Yeah, charge me $1 for this 3 day trial, but also sign me up for all these other programs that will bang my card for $60-120/each"

You'd think you were getting a 3 day trial for a buck but instead you'd be getting a $300-1000 charge on your card.



> You'd think you were getting a 3 day trial for a buck but instead you'd be getting a $300-1000 charge on your card.

The same technique, though not to such an extreme degree, was used to make candidate loans in the last US election.


The people that come up with this shit are evil.......


you are not wrong, but it was not every porn site doing that, yet they are all suffering from that practice.

I think it led the porn processors like ccbill to become more diligent about agreements / checking on customers doing such things and making sure they were not hidden if employed.

Sadly it's crap like that that is cited in making it harder / more expensive for small operators to do business, yet from what I gather it's harder to unsubscribe from the NY times than it is multiple porn sites these days.

I wish the exorbitant fees they charge due to higher chargebacks like that were only charged to people who engage in such things - it sucks that people who do a fair above board business are charged extra - it's just an excuse to soak others at this point.


ok that's oddly specific.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: