Is that a moral distinction? Then both are right. It's not 'yours', but the law says otherwise.
The reason is, the common con game where criminals would send expensive items to someone, often a recently deceased person, and demand payment. The surviving family would assume that good ol' Dad had ordered it and pay up.
The item was usually junk but with a high price tag. So the con had little to lose.
Anyway, items mailed to you without being explicitely ordered are yours to keep, legally.
Not making my self clear. The unordered item, traditionally a bible with the deceased's name in gold lettering (so it cannot reasonably be returned) is delivered with a wildly optimistic price tag. In the hope that the suckers will pay up without question.
The reason is, the common con game where criminals would send expensive items to someone, often a recently deceased person, and demand payment. The surviving family would assume that good ol' Dad had ordered it and pay up.
The item was usually junk but with a high price tag. So the con had little to lose.
Anyway, items mailed to you without being explicitely ordered are yours to keep, legally.