>And somehow a $32/month fee is made out to be a deal breaker?
Yes, it is _if_ workers believe it makes their economic situation worse.
I'm stating that workers weigh the balance of both
the positives and the negatives of union representation. You are only stating one side: the positives.
Yes, even $377 can be too much money to pay especially if it has the unwanted effect of incentivizing the company to move somewhere else. Since workers are concerned about this bad outcome, you can't just handwave it away as if their fears are just imaginary.
Yes, it is _if_ workers believe it makes their economic situation worse.
I'm stating that workers weigh the balance of both the positives and the negatives of union representation. You are only stating one side: the positives.
Yes, even $377 can be too much money to pay especially if it has the unwanted effect of incentivizing the company to move somewhere else. Since workers are concerned about this bad outcome, you can't just handwave it away as if their fears are just imaginary.