In modern reality, I think authors don't have a moral right to not check the perspectives of what they not say, if the article has "hey, look at these russians/americans/asians" vibes, especially when it hits front pages. We are not claiming that thing explodes, we claim that it is potentially misleading for unaware groups. I can't see any warm reason to refuse these clarifications to appear here.
The article doesn't make such a claim, but it also doesn't make a contrary, leaving it to the structure, which feels questionable.
The article doesn't make such a claim, but it also doesn't make a contrary, leaving it to the structure, which feels questionable.