>> However, no dynamic language can match the speed of carefully written static code in a language like Rust.
>> Any blanket statement of the form "static languages are better at x than dynamic languages" is almost certainly nonsense.
> Those two quoted statements come from the article.
I think author had in mind "ALL static languages are better at x than ALL dynamic languages" as a nonsense. He probably didn't have in mind that "A static language_ IS better at x than A dynamic language_" is a nonsense.
>> Any blanket statement of the form "static languages are better at x than dynamic languages" is almost certainly nonsense.
> Those two quoted statements come from the article.
I think author had in mind "ALL static languages are better at x than ALL dynamic languages" as a nonsense. He probably didn't have in mind that "A static language_ IS better at x than A dynamic language_" is a nonsense.